Notes of Faith October 27, 2020

His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us. — 2 Peter 1:3

How can we develop a faith strong enough to see us throughout our lives? The key is this: God wants us to be spiritually strong and has provided us with every resource we need. We need God’s strength to face life’s challenges — and He wants to give it to us.

Tragically, many Christians never discover this. They have committed their lives to Christ... they may be active in their churches... they pray and read their Bibles on occasion — but they remain spiritually immature and weak in the face of life’s temptations and setbacks.

We may be old in years, but if our faith is immature, we will be fearful and unprepared. But it doesn’t need to be this way. Just as a baby needs food and exercise in order to grow, so we need the spiritual food and exercise God has provided for us. Without them our faith is weak, but with them spiritual strength increases, and we are better prepared for whatever life has in store for us.

What are you doing now that will make you spiritually mature when you’re older?

From Seedling to Tree

He shall be like a tree Planted by the rivers of water, That brings forth its fruit in its season. — Psalm 1:3

It is no accident that the Bible compares us to trees, urging us to grow spiritual roots that are deep and strong. But a tree wasn’t always a tree. It began as a small seed. Spiritual life also begins with a seed — the seed of God’s Word planted in the soil of our souls that eventually sprouts and becomes a new seedling as we are born again. But though we’re saved, we aren’t meant to remain spiritual seedlings, weak and vulnerable to every temptation or doubt or falsehood or fear. God’s will is for us to grow strong in our faith and become mature, grounded in the truth of His Word and firmly committed to doing His will (1 Peter 2:2).

Giving your life to Christ is an essential first step — but it is only the first step. God’s will is for you to become spiritually mature, growing stronger in your relationship to Christ and your service for Him. Conversion is the work of an instant; spiritual maturity is the work of a lifetime.

Is your faith like a seedling, a sprout, or a mature tree?

Mature Fruit

Be mature and complete, not lacking anything. — James 1:4 NIV

We cannot pretend to be something we are not; a Christlike character cannot be faked. If Christ is not real to us or if we haven’t learned to walk with Him and submit our lives to Him every day, then our spiritual impact will be far less than it might have been. People are very sensitive to hypocrisy; if they sense it in us, they will dismiss our pretenses and pay no attention to our advice. On the other hand, if they can sense our faith is sincere and our love is authentic, then they will respect us and take us seriously (even when they know we are not perfect).

This is why it is important to begin building our lives on the solid foundation of Jesus Christ now, instead of waiting until it is too late and the problems of old age overwhelm us. Every gardener knows that mature fruit does not appear overnight. It takes time to grow — and so does the fruit of the Spirit in our lives. Start tending your garden today, so you may be “mature and complete.”

In what place in your life do you most need spiritual growth?

Excerpted from Peace for Each Day by Billy Graham, copyright Billy Graham Literary Trust.

We don’t have to stay fearful and unprepared. The Lord intends for us to mature, to grow, and to become secure and ready for what is ahead by standing firm and growing in grace in Jesus Christ.

Pastor Dale

 

Notes of Faith October 26, 2020

Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. (1 Corinthians 1:22–24)

Call That Creates

When the called look at Christ crucified, they don’t see a stumbling block; they don’t see folly. They see power. So, there are three groups in those verses: (1) Jews, (2) Gentiles, (3) called. That’s not quite accurate, is it? Let me say it a little more carefully. There are: (1) Jews who are not called, (2) Gentiles who are not called, and (3) Jews and Gentiles who are called.

Those are the three groups. Are you with me? We’re considering our calling. We’re obeying 1 Corinthians 1:26. There are Jews not called, Gentiles not called, and Jews and Gentiles, some of whom are called. And then he describes the response of each to the cross.

Jews: “Yeah, stumbling block. A crucified Messiah? Never heard of such a thing.”

Gentiles: “Foolishness. A dying God? Silly — mythological.”

Called: “Power — my God!”

What kind of call is that? I’ll tell you what kind of call it is: it’s the kind of call that creates what it commands. The call gives light. The call creates sight. The call raises the dead. “Lazarus, come forth” (see John 11:43). He didn’t decide to. The call raised him from the dead.

‘Wake Up!’

Let me give you an analogy that could be misleading. It helps me. Just to get your hand around it, because lots of you have never been taught about the call of God: the mighty, effectual, irresistible, powerful, saving, awakening, life-giving call of God that saved you. You’ve never been taught about this, so you need a little analogy to help you, instead of saying, “What is he talking about? I’ve never heard anything like this. I thought I just believed in Jesus.”

“If I need wisdom, Christ is my wisdom. If I need righteousness, he’s my righteousness.”

Suppose somebody is asleep, and you want to wake them up. What do you do? They’re sound asleep. You bend over them and you say, “Wake up!” And they bolt right upright. Now, what are the dynamics of that moment? They were sound asleep, and then they were awake. Did they hear the call and say, “I’ll think about that before I wake up, and then I’ll decide if I want to wake up”? That is a good analogy. When God issues a call to your dead heart and says, “Wake up!” you wake up. You did not make yourself a Christian. Just face it: you didn’t make yourself a Christian, which is why you should feel so incredibly loved.

In fact, if you need a text to say that, just go to Ephesians 2:4, where Paul says just as clearly as can be that, because of his “great love,” he made you alive when you were dead. It’s the only place he uses that phrase — “great love” — in all the New Testament. So, if you have any spiritual life in you at all, you have been greatly loved. It’s called regeneration; it’s called calling. You have been called, and you are greatly loved in this calling.

God Put You in Christ

God loved you by putting you in Christ. First Corinthians 1:30: “And because of him you are in Christ Jesus.” That’s pretty clear. In the original, very, very literally it would go, “From him are you in Christ Jesus,” or, “Of him are you in Christ Jesus.” “Because of him” is probably a pretty good translation: because of his doing, because of his work, you are in Christ Jesus.

So, he chose you “before the foundation of the world” (Ephesians 1:4). He, through Billy Graham, or a preacher, or your mom’s testimony, or reading the Bible, or hearing a worship song, or however he wanted to do it as far as human agency goes, he spoke the word, “Wake up!” or “Come!” or “Live!” And you suddenly stopped seeing the cross as folly. You stopped seeing the cross as boring. You stopped seeing the cross as mythological. You stopped seeing the cross as a stumbling block. Suddenly, it was what you needed, and true. And you embraced it. You embraced it. Because God woke you up, changed your heart. And in that, you were united to Christ.

When we were talking about the doctrine of regeneration or the new birth, I tried to explain how calling, regeneration, faith, and union with Christ are simultaneous. There are causal connections here, but there aren’t temporal gaps. In an instant — in an instant — he awakened you from the dead. Your eyes were opened, and what you saw was a glorious Christ. And in seeing him as glorious, you were a believer; you were. That’s what being a believer means: “He’s glorious. He’s Savior. He’s Lord. He is mine.” That’s what it is to see him for what he really is. And in that moment, you were united to Jesus, which means God loved you by making Christ your wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption.

So, God awakened you, united you to Christ so that you have a vital union with Jesus. You’re connected with him — like a vine and a branch?

All He Is, You Are

Look at verse 30 again:

And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption.

“The call gives light. The call creates sight. The call raises the dead.”

So, when you unite with Christ, all that he is, now you are — without making you God. All the benefits that are in him, all the inheritance that is in him, all that he ever purchased, all the obedience he ever performed, all the forgiveness he ever purchased, you now have by virtue of union with him, which you know by faith and which God worked sovereignly. He has become, through God’s loving you, everything for you.

When I walked in tonight and heard the worship team rehearsing, “Hallelujah, all I have is Christ. Hallelujah, Jesus is my life,” I said to Chuck, “Okay, I’m doing an audible here.” I had a hymn picked out for the end. But we’re going to do that: “All I Have Is Christ.” This is verse 30, right? If I need wisdom, he’s my wisdom. If I need righteousness, he’s my righteousness. If I need sanctification, redemption . . .

Jesus is our “All In All”.  He is all we need for life and that eternal!

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 25, 2020

I know that it is not tomorrow yet but I wanted to post this today in response to the Notes of Faith post dated October 23, 2020.

I did not take John Piper’s article to say that neither candidate is good or righteous, therefore he is voting for no one.  I did not think he was trying to compare the acts of one against the other.  I did think he was trying to get our focus on Jesus, no matter the outcome.  However, having not spoken to John, nor knowing his mind, I submit to you another article which more closely follows my own (slow) train of thought.

My Response to John Piper's 'Paths to Ruin' Article

Oct 23, 2020 by Gary DeMar from Americanvision.org

Pastors are supposed to be prophets, not in the sense of foretelling but in forthtelling. The Old Testament prophets were critical of the immoral—lawless—actions of Israel’s religious and civil leaders, and they were never nice about it (e.g., Jer. 2:20; 3:1–3; Jer. 5:7–8).

Jesus was equally critical and used harsh language to call out the religious establishment of the day:

Jesus said, “You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good?” (Matt. 12:34)

And Jesus turned on them and said, “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are. “Woe to you, blind guides! … You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. … You hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of dead men’s bones and everything unclean. … And you say, “If we had lived in the days of our forefathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.” So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of the sin of your forefathers! You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell? (Matt. 23).

Jesus didn’t hold back in an attempt to be diplomatic or pious. He told it like it was. Pastors need to do the same and not try to be religious diplomats when someone is trying to burn down your house or sink the ship of State.

Rousas J. Rushdoony wrote an article years ago that speaks to the different types of preaching and teaching we have today. The following is a condensed version written by Jim West of the longer Rushdoony article. [1]:

The first approach would be the traditional, orthodox approach. The preacher is serious about the text, but it’s the seriousness of the classroom, not the world and life. The preacher carries his study into the pulpit; he explores the etymology of the words house, fire, and man. The auditor is educated, but not inspired to action. He is not told to do anything.

The second preacher is the modern evangelical. Scholarship is anathema to him. His concern is personal experience. He is a “skyscraper preacher” interested in stories and anecdotes. It is “me-centered” preaching. Experience is King of kings and Lord of lords.

Then there is the neo-orthodox, modernist preacher. He approaches the text with certain false premises. The “fire” is treated seriously, but not literally. He argues that this is “holy history, but not real history.” Fire is good; fire often cleanses. But fear of “fire” is barbarous and superstitious. For us, fire can even be a symbol of hope. “Burn, baby, burn!” Torch the old order and bring on the new. There is hope in destruction. “Man, your house is on fire” is a recipe for worldwide peace.

Then there is the new reformation preacher. He condemns all other preachers. He says that the statement “Man, your house is on fire” is not propositional truth. What we should be concerned about is God’s mighty acts in history, the history of redemption. We must not interpret “Man, your house is on fire” moralistically. This is merely God’s way of telling us to decapitalize ourselves and to help the poor. The call is for social action.

To these approaches Rushdoony argues that the words “Man, your house is on fire” is God’s call for preachers to quench the hellish fire by applicatory preaching. Tell God’s people to put the fire out!

I’m a bit confused as to what point John Piper is trying to make in his article “Policies, Persons, and Paths to Ruin: Pondering the Implications of the 2020 Election.” The article reminds me of the following verse:

For if the bugle produces an indistinct sound, who will prepare himself for battle? (1 Cor. 14:8)

Piper begins by stating that he’s not going to tell people how he’s going to vote and nothing he says in his article is “intended to dictate how anyone else should vote, but rather to point to a perspective that seems to be neglected.” Neither Jesus nor the Apostle Paul took this approach. You knew exactly what they meant and who they meant it for.

There are stark differences between the two political parties on most issues. When weighed on the scales of God’s law, it’s clear that the Democrats deserve all the criticism they are getting and then some. The Republicans need to be taken to task as well, but in terms of this election, the Democrats need to go down in flames. James White is on point with this comment:

John Piper's article demonstrates that even godly men can fall into the same pit of error: this isn’t about either Trump or Biden, both of whom are horribly flawed candidates. This is about a Marxist revolution and whether you will even get to vote in 2024. The reality I wish he understood is seen not in Trump's arrogance or Biden’s cowardice—but in history in that Marxism brings death and tyranny.

Again, I’m not sure what Piper means with the following statement:

I think Roe is an evil decision. I think Planned Parenthood is a code name for baby-killing and (historically at least) ethnic cleansing. And I think it is baffling and presumptuous to assume that pro-abortion policies kill more people than a culture-saturating, pro-self-pride.

When a leader models self-absorbed, self-exalting boastfulness, he models the most deadly behavior in the world. He points his nation to destruction. Destruction of more kinds than we can imagine.

It is naïve to think that a man can be effectively pro-life and manifest consistently the character traits that lead to death—temporal and eternal.

What is he talking about? He admits that abortion is baby-killing and yet he seems to compare abortion and ethnic cleansing to people (leaders?) who are self-absorbed and boastful.

And what does he mean by this statement?: And I think it is baffling and presumptuous to assume that pro-abortion policies kill more people than a culture-saturating, pro-self-pride.

I'm sorry, but there is little or no moral equivalence here. Not all boastful and self-pride people kill people, but people who indiscriminately support the killing of people are boastful and filled with pride. There's a difference. Pres. Trump may be boastful and filled with pride, but he is not advocating for wholesale abortion laws and ethnic cleansing. The United States just joined a coalition of 31 other countries by signing onto the Geneva Consensus Declaration that states that there is no global right to abortion. Would this happen under a Biden-Harris administration? Did it happen under an Obama-Biden administration?

It’s no wonder millions of Christians are directionless. Their spiritual leaders are like a spinning compass as the following from Piper attests:

Where does that leave me as I face a civic duty on November 3? Here’s my answer. I do not require anyone to follow me (as if I could)—not my wife, not my friends, not my colleagues.

With a cheerful smile, I will explain to my unbelieving neighbor why my allegiance to Jesus set me at odds with death—death by abortion and death by arrogance.

I will not develop some calculus to determine which path of destruction I will support. That is not my duty.

A man in his position should be leading not equivocating. “Death by arrogance”? What specifically does he have in mind?

Seeing evil and doing little or nothing to stop it because it might “undermine” an “authentic Christian witness” is bewildering to me. The numerous policies being promoted by the Democrat Party will hurt Christians as well as our unbelieving neighbors. Abortion and forcing parents to allow their eight-year-old children to “change” their sex are just two examples. If you love your neighbor, the choice on November 3rd is clear.

Piper offers no practical or tactical advice on how to confront the present social, cultural, and political evil. Instead, he preaches a message of inevitable defeat and how Christians should respond after the defeat:

Imagine that America collapses. First anarchy, then tyranny—from the right or the left. Imagine that religious freedom is gone. What remains for Christians is fines, prison, exile, and martyrdom. Then ask yourself this: Has my preaching been developing real, radical Christians? Christians who can sing on the scaffold,

Let goods and kindred go,
This mortal life also;
The body they may kill:
God’s truth abideth still;
His kingdom is forever.

Christians who will act like the believers in Hebrews 10:34: “You joyfully accepted the plundering of your property, since you knew that you yourselves had a better possession and an abiding one.” Christians who will face hate and reviling and exclusion for Christ’s sake and yet “rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold, [their] reward is great in heaven” (Luke 6:22–23).

His eschatology doesn’t allow for any success this side of martyrdom and persecution. See "John Piper, the Coronavirus, and the End Times."

Is future persecution and martyrdom our only alternatives? Why aren’t pastors “developing real, radical Christians” today to ensure that these things don't happen? What makes anyone think pastors will do better under the conditions Piper outlines when civilization burns to the ground?  We aren’t first-century Christians without any say in how our government is run. We are, like the Apostle Paul (who was a Roman citizen) citizens of the here and now (Acts 16:31–40; 22:22–29) who have the freedom, right, and responsibility to "petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Paul was neither a pietist nor a quietist. Consider the incident he had with the mighty Roman Empire:

But Paul said to [the policemen sent by the chief magistrates to release Silas and him], “They have beaten us in public without trial, men who are Romans, and have thrown us into prison; and now are they sending us away secretly? No indeed! But let them come themselves and bring us out.” The policemen reported these words to the chief magistrates. They were afraid when they heard that they were Romans, and they came and appealed to them, and when they had brought them out, they kept begging them to leave the city. They went out of the prison and entered the house of Lydia, and when they saw the brethren, they encouraged them and departed (Acts 16:37–40).

Paul also called the high priest a “whitewashed wall” (Acts 23:1–10) that he never apologized for saying. Jesus said something similar (Matt. 23:24–28).

So much more could be said and has been said for decades.

I’ll end with this: I am sure the Jews being sent to the gas ovens were more concerned about their own physical death at the command of a tyrant than someone who might be arrogant but worked to stop the trains on the way to their doom. There is a difference, and anyone unable to note the difference is confused.

I am not sure that this person understood John Piper or whether he spoke to him before writing this article in response.  It is a lot easier to understand one another if we would speak to one another, not using memes, gifs, or an assorted other varieties of things in media that do not help us communicate well. 

If anything I have shared or posted myself is confusing or that you agree/disagree with, I would be pleased to have you respond in kind … sending words, speaking so that I can understand your position and make sure that you understand mine.  Thank you for reading anything God gives me to share with you.

May we be blessed to walk this journey together until God takes us home!

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 24, 2020

How do we raise kids who are not naive and not cynical? It’s a question from a dad, a listener to the podcast named Rick in Fort Worth, Texas. “Hello, Pastor John! Matthew 10:16 says we are to be ‘shrewd as snakes and innocent as doves.’ As we raise our children, we don’t want them to be gullible or naive. Yet, we also don’t want them to be hard-hearted and cynical. How then do we shape their perspectives in preparing them for this world? What mistakes and consequences can be the result of this effort?”

Well, this is such a good question because it reflects a very mature grasp of one of the main paradoxes of the Christian life.

On the one hand, Jesus is sending us out into the world like sheep amid wolves. Sheep are very vulnerable. They’re not viewed as belligerent. Nobody is afraid of a sheep biting them. On the other hand, we are to be wise, and discerning, and mature, and stable, and strong, and shrewd, and not duped by the winds of false teaching. There it is, the paradox — and he’s got it. We’re to be, on the one hand, humble and lowly, counting others more significant than ourselves (Philippians 2:3) — and yet, on the other hand, unwavering in our convictions, full of courage, because Proverbs says, “The righteous are bold as a lion” (Proverbs 28:1).

“Meekness is willing to take suffering. And it is so content in God that it rejoices in the suffering.”

So, Rick, it seems to me, has a pretty good grasp of the challenge in front of us, not only to be this way, but to raise kids who become adults who are this way. Now, I don’t know that I can say anything he wouldn’t think of on his own since he’s got such a good handle on this, it seems to me, but I’ll try. Let me make four suggestions. I think it will be obvious what sorts of mistakes could arise in the effort to carry out these suggestions; we’ll see.

1.     Illustrate the paradox.

From the earliest age, teach the children from the Bible, day in and day out, with specific biblical statements about this paradox of shrewdness like snakes and innocence like doves. And fill out the teachings with stories from the Bible — and then maybe stories from Christian history, biography, or from the current day. Whenever you see someone in a biography, or in history, or in missions, or in contemporary life, illustrate the paradox. Point it out: help the children see the beauty of it and how much you admire it, and they should admire it.

Let me give a specific example of the kind of teaching I mean when I say, “Pick out specific sentences to illustrate what this paradox looks like.” I’m really influenced here by what I’ve been thinking about recently because we at Desiring God have tried to articulate a core value that gets at this very thing. I’ll mention the name of it in just a minute.

It says in Ephesians 4:1–2 to “walk in a manner worthy” of our calling as Christians. Then it gives three words — more than three, but I’ll just mention the first three: being lowly, meek, and long-suffering. We read that to our children. Then we ask them, “What do you think those three words mean?”

Let’s talk about lowly. What is lowly? Humble because of our sin, and what terrible suffering it took to save us, and how dependent we are on God all the time. Lowly and meek: dove-like, sheep-like, a way of life that fits in with lowliness and long-suffering, not getting angry easily, not returning evil for evil.

Then you pause and you press in further with your kids as you work through what those words mean, modeling for the kids how to take the words of Scripture seriously. And you ask, “What is the way of life that Paul calls meek that’s supposed to fit with this lowliness of attitude?” Then you show them. Now, I’m thinking of this right now just because, in my working through Ephesians in Look at the Book, this was so incredibly fresh to me. I’ve never seen these three verses together like this. I asked the question to myself, and now I’m asking it to my imaginary kids in front of me: What are some illustrations of what meekness looks like? Because we want to get this right here. We don’t want meekness to look like it isn’t.

Restore, Correct, Defend

Here are the three illustrations:

Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness [meekness]. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted. (Galatians 6:1)

Now, here’s the catcher: it takes a lot of guts, a lot of courage, to confront somebody in a bad behavior. It’s just so much easier to sweep it under the rug. Everybody else is just ignoring it. You’re going to go to him with courage and confront him — but you’re going to do it in meekness. Meekness is that courageous, lowly way of doing it.

Here’s a second illustration:

The Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness [meekness]. (2 Timothy 2:24–25)

“You can be a sharp, careful, incisive critic of culture, and yet you might love it and care for it and pray for it.”

Now, there it is again. The first illustration from Galatians was about correcting their behavior. The second illustration is about correcting their doctrine. And that may even require more courage, depending on what kind of person they are. You’re going to get in their face and tell them that what they believe about this is not true. But you’re going to do it with meekness. Meekness is combined in those two instances with courage

Here’s the third one:

Have no fear of them, nor be troubled . . . always being prepared to make a defense . . . for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness [meekness] and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame. (1 Peter 3:14–16)

Meekness stands in front of people who are perhaps gnashing their teeth and ready to revile you and slander you, and it speaks a witness for Jesus courageously, boldly, and yet with meekness.

Gentle Courage

You then step back with those three illustrations out there for your kids, and you say, “What is meekness? What is a meek person like?” The answer is this: courage, courage, courage, courage. Correcting behaviors, correcting teachings, bearing witness in front of slanderers — but all of it with a gentle and humble demeanor. Now, that’s going to be a paradox for them they’re going to wrestle with for the rest of their lives. Oh my, to return to it again and again and again in our Bible reading would be wonderful.

Then you might illustrate it from Acts 5, where the apostles had been beaten for their witness, and it says in Acts 5:41, “Then they left the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer dishonor for the name.” Meekness is willing to take suffering. And it is so content in God, so confident in God, that it rejoices in the suffering. You teach from specific texts and stories and illustrations about this paradox of courage and meekness.

2.     Look for pithy phrases.

The second thing would be simply to look for sharp, clear, memorable, provocative phrases that can sum up what you’re trying to get across. Now, that’s what we’ve been doing at Desiring God. We’ve hit upon two phrases: one is called brokenhearted boldness, and the other is contrite courage.

That’s one of our core values now because we want to try to get at this paradox in a very controversial, strident, angry age we live in, and look at what courage looks like. What is this supposed to look like when Christians are courageous? Are they supposed to be brash, and braggarts, and loud, and strident? Or is there another way?

I think finding a phrase that you repeat year after year for your kids, so that when they leave home twenty years from now, they’ll remember, “Well, there was something called brokenhearted boldness, there was something called contrite courage that my dad believed in. I’d like to discover it again.”

3.     Model what you want to see.

The third thing I would suggest is this: be a model for your children in this. Be bold, be humble, be courageous, be contrite. Over time, they’re going to see this. One special form of modeling that I think is really important happens in this media-saturated time, where you’re looking at the news, you’re looking at videos, you’re looking at YouTube, you’re looking at all kinds of things, and you see stuff you can’t stand. It really bothers you. It’s so harmful, it’s so unbiblical, and the kids know that you feel that way about it, and they’re watching.

“Joy in the Lord in the midst of hardship is a great evidence to the children that Christ is real.”

Now, how’s Dad, how’s Mom going to respond to these things they so strongly disagree with? You want to model for them by saying, “Now, this is wrong. This is hurtful. This dishonors God.” You want to show them, “How do you love your enemy at that moment?” You might pause at that very moment, turn off the news, and pray. Pray for the person whom you just criticized because of how destructive their view was. The kids will learn: you can be a sharp, careful, incisive critic of the culture, and yet you might love it and care for it and pray for it as you ought.

4.     Exude joy.

The last thing I would say is this: Don’t be joyless; be full of joy. I look back on my parents’ effort to give me strong convictions in the midst of worldliness that they thought was encroaching on every side, even back in the fifties and sixties. I think the key that won me over so that I embrace their faith today — the key was that they were both not only Bible-saturated, with high moral standards, but they were the happiest people I think I’ve ever known.

I took it for granted growing up. Now I look back on some of the things they went through in their marriage, and in finances, and in culture, and in disputes, and I marvel that they were as happy as they were. Joy in the Lord in the midst of hardship is a great evidence to the children that Christ is real. It doesn’t guarantee that they will embrace the truth and the beauty of Christ, but it is a powerful attraction.

John Piper (@JohnPiper) is founder and teacher of desiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary

How does a (pastor) shepherd take care of his flock so that they are not naïve and cynical?  This application sounds a whole lot like what needs to take place in the church.  I pray that I am aiming at this target and blessing our flock with truth and my life among you.

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 23, 2020

Policies, Persons, and Paths to Ruin

PONDERING THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2020 ELECTION

This article is probably as close as you will get to an answer on how I will vote in the upcoming presidential election.

Probably?

Right. Only God knows what may happen in the next days.

Nothing I say here is intended to dictate how anyone else should vote, but rather to point to a perspective that seems to be neglected. Yes, this perspective sways my vote. But you need not be sinning if you weigh matters differently.

Actually, this is a long-overdue article attempting to explain why I remain baffled that so many Christians consider the sins of unrepentant sexual immorality (porneia), unrepentant boastfulness (alazoneia), unrepentant vulgarity (aischrologia), unrepentant factiousness (dichostasiai), and the like, to be only toxic for our nation, while policies that endorse baby-killing, sex-switching, freedom-limiting, and socialistic overreach are viewed as deadly.

The reason I put those Greek words in parentheses is to give a graphic reminder that these are sins mentioned in the New Testament. To be more specific, they are sins that destroy people. They are not just deadly. They are deadly forever. They lead to eternal destruction (2 Thessalonians 1:9).

They destroy persons (Acts 12:20–23). And through persons, they destroy nations (Jeremiah 48:29–31, 42).

Persons

Forgiveness through Christ is always possible where there is repentance and childlike trust in Jesus. But where humble repentance is absent, the sins condemn.

The New Testament teaches that “those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God” (Galatians 5:21) and that “those who practice such things deserve to die” (Romans 1:32).

To which you may say, “So what? Rejecting Jesus as Lord also leads to death, but you are willing to vote for a non-Christian, aren’t you?” I am, assuming there is enough overlap between biblical uprightness and the visible outworking of his character and convictions.

My point so far is simply to raise the stakes of what is outwardly modeled in leadership, so that Christians are given pause. It is not a small thing to treat lightly a pattern of public behaviors that lead to death.

Nations

In fact, I think it is a drastic mistake to think that the deadly influences of a leader come only through his policies and not also through his person.

“Flagrant boastfulness, vulgarity, and factiousness are not only self-incriminating; they are nation-corrupting.”TweetShare on Facebook

This is true not only because flagrant boastfulness, vulgarity, immorality, and factiousness are self-incriminating, but also because they are nation-corrupting. They move out from centers of influence to infect whole cultures. The last five years bear vivid witness to this infection at almost every level of society.

This truth is not uniquely Christian: “A little leaven leavens the whole lump” (1 Corinthians 5:6). “Bad company ruins good morals” (1 Corinthians 15:33). Whether you embrace that company in your house or on social media, it corrupts. There are sins that “lead people into more and more ungodliness” as “their talk [spreads] like gangrene” (2 Timothy 2:16–17).

There is a character connection between rulers and subjects. When the Bible describes a king by saying, “He sinned and made Israel to sin” (1 Kings 14:16), it does not mean he twisted their arm. It means his influence shaped the people. That’s the calling of a leader. Take the lead in giving shape to the character of your people. So it happens. For good or for ill.

Policies and Persons

Is it not baffling, then, that so many Christians seem to be sure that they are saving human lives and freedoms by treating as minimal the destructive effects of the spreading gangrene of high-profile, high-handed, culture-shaping sin?

This point has a special relevance for Christians.

Freedom and life are precious. We all want to live and be free to pursue happiness. But if our freedoms, and even our lives, are threatened or taken, the essence of our identity in Christ, the certainty of our everlasting joy with Christ, and the holiness and love for which we have been saved by Christ — none of these is lost with the loss of life and freedom.

Therefore, Christians communicate a falsehood to unbelievers (who are also baffled!) when we act as if policies and laws that protect life and freedom are more precious than being a certain kind of person. The church is paying dearly, and will continue to pay, for our communicating this falsehood year after year.

The justifications for ranking the destructive effects of persons below the destructive effects of policies ring hollow.

I find it bewildering that Christians can be so sure that greater damage will be done by bad judges, bad laws, and bad policies than is being done by the culture-infecting spread of the gangrene of sinful self-exaltation, and boasting, and strife-stirring (eristikos).

How do they know this? Seriously! Where do they get the sure knowledge that judges, laws, and policies are less destructive than boastful factiousness in high places?

What About Abortion?

Where does the wickedness of defending child-killing come from? It comes from hearts of self-absorbed arrogance and boasting (James 4:1–2). It comes from hearts that are insubordinate to God. In other words, it comes from the very character that so many Christian leaders are treating as comparatively innocuous, because they think Roe and SCOTUS and Planned Parenthood are more pivotal, more decisive, battlegrounds.

“It is baffling to assume that pro-abortion policies kill more people than a culture-saturating, pro-self pride.”

I think Roe is an evil decision. I think Planned Parenthood is a code name for baby-killing and (historically at least) ethnic cleansing. And I think it is baffling and presumptuous to assume that pro-abortion policies kill more people than a culture-saturating, pro-self pride.

When a leader models self-absorbed, self-exalting boastfulness, he models the most deadly behavior in the world. He points his nation to destruction. Destruction of more kinds than we can imagine.

It is naive to think that a man can be effectively pro-life and manifest consistently the character traits that lead to death — temporal and eternal.

Word to Pastors

May I suggest to pastors that in the quietness of your study you do this? Imagine that America collapses. First anarchy, then tyranny — from the right or the left. Imagine that religious freedom is gone. What remains for Christians is fines, prison, exile, and martyrdom. Then ask yourself this: Has my preaching been developing real, radical Christians? Christians who can sing on the scaffold,

Let goods and kindred go,

This mortal life also;

The body they may kill:

God’s truth abideth still;

His kingdom is forever.

Christians who will act like the believers in Hebrews 10:34: “You joyfully accepted the plundering of your property, since you knew that you yourselves had a better possession and an abiding one.” Christians who will face hate and reviling and exclusion for Christ’s sake and yet “rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold, [their] reward is great in heaven” (Luke 6:22–23).

Have you been cultivating real Christians who see the beauty and the worth of the Son of God? Have you faithfully unfolded and heralded “the unsearchable riches of Christ” (Ephesians 3:8)? Are you raising up generations of those who say with Paul, “I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord” (Philippians 3:8)?

Have you shown them that they are “sojourners and exiles” (1 Peter 2:11), and that their “citizenship is in heaven,” from which they “await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ” (Philippians 3:20)? Do they feel in their bones that “to live is Christ, and to die is gain” (Philippians 1:21)?

Or have you neglected these greatest of all realities and repeatedly diverted their attention onto the strategies of politics? Have you inadvertently created the mindset that the greatest issue in life is saving America and its earthly benefits? Or have you shown your people that the greatest issue is exalting Christ with or without America? Have you shown them that the people who do the most good for the greatest number for the longest time (including America!) are people who have the aroma of another world with another King?

Election Day

Where does that leave me as I face a civic duty on November 3? Here’s my answer. I do not require anyone to follow me (as if I could) — not my wife, not my friends, not my colleagues.

“With a cheerful smile, I will explain to my unbelieving neighbor why my allegiance to Jesus set me at odds with death — death by abortion and death by arrogance.”TweetShare on Facebook

I will not develop some calculus to determine which path of destruction I will support. That is not my duty. My calling is to lead people to see Jesus Christ, trust his forgiveness for sins, treasure him above everything in this world, live in a way that shows his all-satisfying value, and help them make it to heaven with love and holiness. That calling is contradicted by supporting either pathway to cultural corruption and eternal ruin.

You may believe that there are kinds of support for such pathways that do not involve such a contradiction — such an undermining of authentic Christian witness. You must act on what you see. I can’t see it. That is why I said my way need not be yours.

When I consider the remote possibility that I might do any good by endorsing the devastation already evident in the two choices before me, I am loath to undermine my calling (and the church’s mission) to stand for Christ-exalting faith and hope and love.

I will be asked to give an account of my devotion to this life-giving calling. The world will ask. And the Lord of heaven will ask. And my conscience will ask. What will I say?

With a cheerful smile, I will explain to my unbelieving neighbor why my allegiance to Jesus set me at odds with death — death by abortion and death by arrogance. I will take him to Psalm 139 and Romans 1. And if he is willing, I will show him how abortion and arrogance can be forgiven because of Christ (Ephesians 1:7). And I will invite him to become an exile — to have a kingdom that will never be shaken, not even when America is a footnote in the archives of the new creation.

John Piper (@JohnPiper) is founder and teacher of desiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary.

I have not seen in my lifetime the country in which God blessed me to live to be so divided.  I have also not seen this country headed toward such an elite group of leaders with the rest of us as serving as pawns in their court.  Though I will vote, I am with John Piper on this one… “This world is not my home,” I am looking for a better, far greater and perfect home with God.  And it may indeed be soon coming for those who follow Christ…in one way or another.  Keep looking up, stand firm in your faith, and trust God to fulfill His promises to you for eternal salvation!

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 22, 2020

Calm and Powerful

A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. — Proverbs 15:1

Often I can remember the turning point of a conversation when it went from good to bad or from bad to good. At times, I could hear the Holy Spirit warn me: “Stay calm, lower your voice, answer gently. Don’t say what you want to say, but listen to My still, small voice and speak My words instead.”

Sometimes I am obedient and listen... Other times I just try to sneak in one more comment before obeying and find out just how costly my foolishness is.

I have found the secret to being heard. It really is quite simple: If you want to be heard, say it the way you would want to hear it.

My children, my husband, my employees, my dog, everyone, in fact, listens more when I say things the way I want to hear them. I know I prefer to be spoken to in a gentle, respectful tone. I hear so much better when I am not being yelled at. It is not the volume level or the repetition of words that grabs the attention, respect, and commitment of others. It is the importance of what we speak and the tone in which it is delivered. No one takes a person seriously if they are throwing a fit. Oh, they may get their way for the moment, but it will cost them later.

We throw fits and raise our voices for many reasons. Here are a few:

1. We are afraid we are not being heard.

2. Yelling has produced results (getting our way) in the past.

3. We want to intimidate or control others.

4. It is what we lived as a child.

5. We are still angry over an unresolved issue.

6. It’s a bad habit.

Most of these reasons are rooted in fear. God has not given us a spirit of fear but of power, love, and a sound mind (2 Timothy 1:7). We will yell and throw fits when we feel powerless. We will seek to intimidate and control others when we are self-serving. We will revert to our past when perfected love has not yet cast out fear. We will overreact whenever we have carried the weight of yesterday’s issues into today.

As we renew our mind, bad habits are broken and the tyranny of fear is thwarted. I found out a long time ago that no matter how things appear, I am not in control of them. I can control myself, but God is ultimately in control of everything.

Accepting this truth puts us in the right state of mind to communicate in such a way that lets us be heard.

Lord, when I struggle and fight to maintain control, help me remember that at the very least I can control my tongue and my tone. By Your grace make me sensitive to Your still, small voice and allow it to guide me.

I Am Strong
WHEN I SPEAK IN A CALM AND POWERFUL WAY.

Excerpted from Strong by Lisa Bevere, copyright Lisa Bevere.

With the Holy Spirit within us, we are empowered to control how we respond in conflict. If we want to be heard, we need to listen and speak with calmness. 

Pastor Dale

 

Notes of Faith October 21, 2020

What is the wise thing to do?

What is the wise thing for me to do? We’ve never met, but here’s something I know about you. Your greatest regret...

And I’m talking about that moment of regret. The moment you would give anything to go back and relive or undo. The tipping point. The point of no return. Your greatest regret was preceded by a series of unwise decisions. They weren’t wrong. They weren’t illegal or immoral. But looking back, they were terribly unwise. And it was that series of unwise decisions that paved the way to the moment in time you’ve regretted ever since.

Right?

How did I know?

It’s the way of things.

Because there isn’t a “Thou shalt not” attached to it doesn’t necessarily mean “Thou shalt.”

It’s foolish to live on the border of what’s permissible, legal, acceptable, not prosecutable.

CAREFUL AND CAUTIOUS

The apostle Paul, in a letter to Christians living in Ephesus, writes:

Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil. —Ephesians 5:15–16, emphasis added.

Two things stand out about Paul’s instructions. First, how relevant his two-thousand-year-old advice is today. Some things never change. Human nature never changes. Ancient folks were as prone as we moderns to snuggle up to disaster and stay there as long as possible. But perhaps the most remarkable thing about Paul’s instruction is what he doesn’t say. Paul was a Pharisee. He had known and taught the Jewish Torah his entire adult life. Once he became a Jesus follower, his perspective of the Jewish law changed, but he didn’t abandon the moral, ethical, or relational guidelines he was raised with. As a Jesus follower, Paul was well aware that Jesus had actually raised the bar rather than lowered it. This is what makes his instructions to Ephesian Christians a bit surprising. We would expect Paul to anchor his readers’ decision-making to something more specific and concrete than wisdom. But he doesn’t. And he tells us why. 

And this is important.

He was aware of what each of us has already discovered. The point of regret is always preceded by a series of unwise decisions. With that in mind... with that in the background of his own life... he says:

Be very careful how you live.

To state it in the negative, Don’t be careless how you live. Then he leverages our word:

Not as unwise, but as wise.

With those six words, Paul discloses the criterion by which he and we are to weigh our options. This is the grid through which we are to evaluate every invitation and opportunity.

This is the standard, the yardstick by which we are to assess our financial, relational, and professional decisions. And thus our question:

What is the wise thing to do?

Paul follows up with a bit of explanation and motivation:

...making the most of every opportunity,

Literally, redeeming or ransoming the time. Don’t you wish you could go back and somehow reclaim all the time you wasted on bad decisions along with the time spent making up for bad decisions? I do. For you that may be a few weeks or weekends scattered about your past. Or it may be an entire season of life. Either way, imagine having the opportunity to re-live, re-spend, or re-allot those days, weeks, or years. What if you had an opportunity to go back and invest that time in productive, healthy, life-giving activities? Imagine where you might be today. Imagine how different things might be. And while we’re daydreaming, imagine being able to reclaim and reinvest all the money you wasted during those seasons.

Yeah, sorry to bring that up.

As painful and as awkward as it might be to look back, it’s necessary to understand the invitation embedded in Paul’s words. Paul’s words are an invitation to invest your time wisely going forward. From this moment on, you are invited to make the most of... to redeem... to leverage your most important asset, your time, in a way that propels you toward a preferred future. That invitation is fueled by wisdom, being careful rather than careless.

Paul offers another bit of motivation to his instruction as well. He warns:

...making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil.

Evil days?

What’s he talking about?

We don’t live in a morally neutral culture. Bet you knew that.

ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL

Every day we interface with a culture that encourages us in the most provocative ways imaginable to satisfy appetites that can never be fully and finally satisfied. Long gone are the days when you had to go looking for trouble. Trouble is always just a click away. Right? Again, Paul’s words are so relevant. We can’t afford to be careless. We don’t live in a morally neutral environment. It’s not safe out there. Most Americans are overweight and overleveraged. We eat too much and spend too much. American men spend billions of dollars... billions... every year looking at pictures of women on their computer screens. That’s as amazing as it is embarrassing.

Like the Ephesians in Paul’s day, we live in morally and ethically perilous times. The days are evil. If we don’t pay attention, if we aren’t careful, we will end up paying a price for our carelessness. If we aren’t intentionally cautious, we may end up unintentionally corralled by a vice we’ve always condemned. If we don’t filter our choices through this powerful question, we will more than likely find ourselves face-to-face with consequences that could have been, and should have been, avoided.

To state it plainly...

Our world is a bit like the beautifully manicured grass outside my kitchen door where we let our dog out to do her business every morning and evening. If you’re not careful how you walk, you’ll step in it. Worse, you’ll bring it into the house!

THIS IS YOUR WAKE-UP CALL

I’ll be honest. The challenge with the wisdom question is that it forces us to face up to the very thing or things we are trying to ignore. It’s like an alarm clock for our consciences.

A wake-up call for our souls. It’s irritating, but necessary.

Perhaps it was the universal propensity to wear out our internal snooze buttons that drove the apostle Paul to continue with these words:

Therefore do not be foolish... 

If punctuation had been available in the first century, this phrase may have come with double exclamation marks. “Do not be foolish” is a polite way of saying, “Don’t be a fool! Don’t approach life as if you lived in a morally and ethically neutral environment!” From there he commands readers to do something that appears to be impossible.

...but understand what the Lord’s will is. — Ephesians 5:17.

You can’t command someone to understand something, can you? I had a Greek teacher in college who would have us come up to the front of the room and translate out loud for the class. There I was with my paperback copy of The Iliad standing in front of my peers bluffing my way through some incident from the Trojan War and filling in the gaps with my own editorial comments. When it became evident that I was no longer translating but merely telling the story from memory, Mrs. Cuntz would stop me and say, “Mr. Andy, I don’t think you are translating. Translate!”

To which I would reply: “Mrs. Cuntz, I can’t translate it.”

Her reply was always the same. “Yes, you can! Now translate it for us.”

“I really can’t.”

“Yes, you can. Now translate.”

She insisted we understood more than we did, as if her insistence would somehow increase our capacity. It didn’t.

Eventually she would wave us back to our seats. I always felt like Mrs. Cuntz took my lack of understanding personally, like she had failed me as a teacher.

Whenever I read Paul’s admonition to “understand what the Lord’s will is,” I think of Mrs. Cuntz exhorting us to understand Plato. You can inspire an athlete to perform better, but you can’t inspire someone to understand something. They either understand it or they don’t. So what’s Paul up to? Why didn’t he say, “Discover what the will of the Lord is”? Or “Obey the will of the Lord”? We could find traction with either of those. But understand?

His point?

FACE-OFF

Paul’s command to “understand” God’s will is an exhortation to face up to what we know in our hearts we ought to do. We are masters in the art of self-deception. So Paul, leveraging the grammar of his day, reaches off the page, grabs us by the collar, pulls us up close, and shouts, “Quit playing games! Quit pretending. Quit rationalizing! Face up to what you know you ought to do! Ask the question and embrace the answer!” This is Paul’s final attempt to get us to admit what we know and act on it.

As commonsense as all this sounds, truth is, most folks don’t make the wise choice until it’s their only choice. By then they’re attempting to reclaim something they’ve lost or are about to lose. Like you, I have friends who changed their unhealthy eating habits overnight after a brush with cancer or heart disease. Lumps, clogs, or short-ness of breath forces us to face up to what we’ve refused to acknowledge for years. Revelations such as these often lead to death-defying discipline.

But why do we wait?

To leverage Paul’s words, we wait because we are unwilling to face up to what we’ve known all along. When we quit lying to ourselves, it’s amazing what happens. Everyone I know who has undergone a transformation following a health scare says the same thing: “I should have made these changes years ago.”

Translated: “For years I refused to face up to what I knew in my heart was true.”

Bankruptcy can have the same effect. So can a surprise pregnancy, a letter from your spouse’s attorney, a DUI, or a trip to detox with one of your kids. And perhaps that’s what it will take. There is something out there somewhere that has the ability to get your attention, something that will force you to face up! Unfortunately, that something may scar you as well as scare you. You may be left with limited options and reduced opportunities. So why let things go that far? Why not face up now to what you know in your heart you need to do? Why not ask, What is the wise thing to do?

Excerpted from Better Decisions, Fewer Regrets by Andy Stanley, copyright Andy Stanley.

How often do we operate as if there needs to be a Thou Shalt Not in order for us to not do it? Why not ask what is the wise thing to do instead?

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 20, 2020

Not long ago I saw an Instagram post criticizing a popular children’s book. In a scene where the main character of the story had fallen off his bike, the character said, “I was brave and did not cry.” This deeply offended a mom, who had crossed out this dialogue and replaced it in permanent marker with, “So I cried because I was sad, and it’s ok to be sad.” Her point was clear: she wanted her children to know that authentically expressing their feelings was far more important than being “brave.”

She had a point. It’s no tragedy for a child or anyone else to cry when hurt. Confessing our weakness and need for help is something nobody should grow out of. But I couldn’t help but think that this mother was missing something. The character in this children’s book was modeling something admirable: the courage to talk back to one’s own emotions, to master our impulses and be resilient in the face of other urges. It felt as if this mother was pitting vulnerability against courage. But what if there’s something more to be said for courage?

Confronting Oneself

When we talk nowadays about courage, we often mean the kind of courage it takes to write a strongly worded social-media post, or publish a book or article that invites controversy. I’m sure the mother who published that Instagram post received encouragement from readers for taking a stand and making a point. But in a digital age, this kind of courage is not necessarily hard to come by. We don’t lack for bold keyboards. What we often lack is courage that doesn’t just speak truth to power, but speaks truth to oneself. Our culture of online bravado can mask our weak presence.

Consider our perfectly curated identities: from posts and comments calculated to bring us the neurological reward of a Like or Retweet, to photos and videos captured, edited, and airbrushed to perfection. Everyone knows by now that our social-media projections are not true to life. But there’s a particular danger for those Christians who are more interested in curating ideas than images.

“Cheap conviction is warring for the truth with no skin in the game.”

It’s never been easier to “defend the truth” in a vapid, performative way, like the Pharisees who made life and devotion hard on the people without even lifting a finger to help (Matthew 23:4). Thanks to always-there internet technologies that blur the line between life online and off, we are perpetually tempted to use our online identities to get the feelings of respect, significance, and even faithfulness that are harder to come by in bodily life.

This can wreak havoc on many biblical virtues, especially courage. It’s never been easier to fool ourselves that we are courageous when we really are not. Like the donkey Puzzle who donned a lion skin to look like Aslan, or the “wizard” of Oz who was really just an old man with a machine, the image we project on our screens can be little more than self-aggrandizement. If our online audience could peek through the phone or laptop we hold, they would see the real us, and our “platform” would be laughed at rather than respected.

Counterfeit Courage

Bravado may momentarily obscure our weakness, but Scripture reminds us that it doesn’t take long to be exposed. Rehoboam, succeeding his father Solomon as king, had a golden opportunity to endear himself to his people (1 Kings 12:1–7). Instead, the young king and his young peers rejected the advice of the older sages, and Rehoboam postured, boasting of his might and responding harshly to the people (1 Kings 12:8–15).

The ruse didn’t work, the people refused to unite behind the childish king, and the kingdom was divided. Rehoboam was foolish, not only because he spoke severely, but because he wasn’t nearly as strong of a leader as he let on. Rehoboam learned the hard way that what we think is courage can really be self-indulgence.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer warned of a gospel-less, repentance-less version of Christianity he called “cheap grace.” But a truth-less, love-less version of Christian activism might also be called “cheap conviction.” Cheap conviction is warring for the truth with no skin in the game. Cheap conviction is what it looks like when we are passionate to win people’s attention rather than winning them.

“Spirit-filled courage looks adversaries in the eye (not just the screen name).”

Cheap conviction sends tweets tearing down brothers and sisters in Christ while sitting comfortably at home without the slightest intention to serve and die for Jesus’s church. It draws hard lines in articles and emails while being ambivalent about personal sins. It’s what happens when we take an online stand against “culture” while our lives are loveless, riskless, graceless, and friendless. It’s counterfeit courage.

In a magisterial sermon titled “The Lord’s Work in the Lord’s Way,” Francis Schaeffer — no stranger to contending for the truth — warned Christians that they must always and only advance Christ’s kingdom in ways that authentically honor him. “The central problem of our age,” Schaeffer observed, is not liberalism or modernism, nor the old Roman Catholicism or the new Roman Catholicism, nor the threat of communism, nor even the threat of rationalism and the monolithic consensus which surrounds us. All these are dangerous but not the primary threat. The real problem is this: the church of the Lord Jesus Christ, individually or corporately, tending to do the Lord’s work in the power of the flesh rather than of the Spirit. The central problem is always in the midst of the people of God, not in the circumstances surrounding them. (No Little People, 66)

Cheap conviction is fleshly. It takes no indwelling of the Spirit to use technology to make a few strangers think we are bold.

Spirit-Filled Courage

Spirit-filled courage is different. Spirit-filled courage looks adversaries in the eye (not just the screen name). Remember what Jesus said: “When they bring you before the synagogues and the rulers and the authorities, do not be anxious about how you should defend yourself or what you should say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say” (Luke 12:11–12). In that passage we see three distinct aspects of real gospel courage.

First, it stands “before” — that is, in a place of true vulnerability. The crowd might reject and jeer you. This is a lot easier to take when there’s a “mute” button right next to you, but Spirit-filled courage will take you to places where there’s nowhere to hide. Does the courage we think we possess take us to these places, or do we regularly avoid opportunities to enter them and make ourselves feel better through digital truth-telling?

Second, Spirit-filled courage is not anxious. God is not a God of panic. For evangelicals especially, “cultural engagement” is too often a sky-is-falling exercise, where reading the headlines of less-influential-than-they-think media outlets leads to frenzied responses that end up speaking reactively instead of confidently. Spirit-filled courage is sober and realistic, but it doesn’t put joy at the mercy of the news. Anger and gracelessness are often signs of a heart that is tangled up in fear. That’s why Spirit-filled courage can speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). It has read the end of the story.

“Spirit-filled courage is sober and realistic, but it doesn’t put joy at the mercy of the news.”

Finally, Spirit-filled courage is seasonable. Jesus’s promise is that the Spirit will teach us “in that very hour” what to say. God loves words that fit the occasion (Proverbs 15:23). It takes effort to know whether courage demands a gentle or strong rebuke, a gospel summary or a surgical dismantling of harmful ideas. This discernment is difficult, but failure can do enormous damage to the church, by treating friends as foes or mistaken ideas as nefarious heresies — or vice versa. Cheap conviction scratches itches, but Spirit-filled courage meets needs.

Why do we drift toward cheap, virtual conviction? Because it’s easy, it’s safe, and it makes us feel righteous. But like all digital trappings, it doesn’t really satisfy. It took a global pandemic to make many of us realize just how insufficient our technological “connection” really is. Spirit-filled courage is the courage that Jesus not only promises he will use, but that he will give. We don’t need a lot of followers, and we don’t need to go viral. We only need to entrust ourselves and our world to him.

Samuel James serves as associate acquisitions editor at Crossway Books and managing editor of Letter & Liturgy.

Our local body of Christ, the CGBC flock, has but a few that live in a virtual world more than face to face. Any who use the God given resource of the internet must be careful to use and not abuse that resource.  God has created us to live in relationship and relationships are created even on the internet, but are they godly and real?  Let us seek, especially in the virtual world, to speak truth in love, and trust God to do His work through us.

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 19, 2020

One human life in all the Scriptures towers above the others. All who came
before anticipated him, and all who follow after orient to him. And thanks to the biographical sketches found in the four Gospels of the New Testament, we know more details about Jesus’s everyday life than any other biblical figure.

Moses and David, and Peter and Paul, who all both wrote much and had much written about them, are not unveiled with the same richness, depth, and detail as Christ. And for good reason. None compares to God himself dwelling among us in fully human soul and body. And no one accomplished the work that he accomplished.

“The Gospels not only show us a man who worked, but also one who didn’t only work.”

All four accounts are Gospels, driving toward his final week, his arrest, his trial, his death, the long pause of Holy Saturday, and then, at last, his resurrection. And so, as careful readers of the Gospels, we beware gathering up details about Jesus’s life and unhitching them from where his whole life was going. Still, we do have more to learn from the life of Christ than the events of his final week (which comprise less than half the Gospels). One theme, especially pronounced in the Gospel of John, is what we might see as the “work ethic” of Christ.

Jesus Worked

Observe, first, that Jesus did work — and consider what he meant by work rather than what we might assume. The night before he died, he prayed to his Father, as his men listened, “I glorified you on earth, having accomplished the work that you gave me to do” (John 17:4). In a sense, his whole life had been a single work — a “life’s work” we might say. He had a calling and commission. His Father gave him work to do. And this was good — a blessing, not a curse.

Jesus did not begrudge this work. Instead, he experienced a kind of satisfaction in doing the work his Father had assigned him. In fact, his soul fed on accomplishing his Father’s work, as he testified standing by the well in Samaria. “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to accomplish his work” (John 4:34).

Jesus also speaks in John 9 about stewarding time in such a life. Here he sounds like Moses’s prayer to “teach us to number our days” (Psalm 90:12) and Paul’s exhortation to “[make] the best use of the time” (Ephesians 5:15–16). “Night is coming, when no one can work,” he says, and knowing that, “we must work the works of him who sent me while it is day” (John 9:4). He had an appointed season of earthly life. Eternity would come, but for now, he was on the clock. He had work to accomplish. “As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world” (John 9:5). He even “worked” on the Sabbath, or at least was accused of it. And he answered the charge not by saying he wasn’t working, but that “My Father is working until now, and I am working” (John 5:17).

He Didn’t Only Work

The Gospels not only show us a man who worked, but also one who didn’t only work. His life was more than his work. He rested and retreated, and called his weary disciples away to rest with him. When they had returned from their commission, and “told him all that they had done and taught” (and teaching, done well, can be really hard work), he said to them,

“Come away by yourselves to a desolate place and rest a while.” For many were coming and going, and they had no leisure even to eat. And they went away in the boat to a desolate place by themselves. (Mark 6:30–32)

Jesus also slept. He may have stayed up all night to pray before choosing his twelve, and eschewed sleep to pray in the garden, but those were unusual circumstances. He slept in peace on a storm-tossed ship until his disciples frantically woke him, and as the great personal fulfillment of the Psalms, he did not despise Solomon’s wisdom in Psalm 127:2,

It is in vain that you rise up early
and go late to rest,
eating the bread of anxious toil;
for he gives to his beloved sleep.

What His Work Accomplished

That Jesus worked (and didn’t only work) is plain enough, but what did his work mean?

Much of what we have from the Gospels about his work is from his own mouth. First, he was conscious that his work bore witness to his Father. Indeed, his life-work was to glorify his Father, to make him known truly and admired duly (John 17:4, 6, 26).

“Every indication we have of Jesus’s life and ministry is that he was (and was known as) a worker, not an idler.”

And Jesus’s works demonstrated that the Father had sent him. “The works that the Father has given me to accomplish, the very works that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father has sent me” (John 5:36; also John 10:25, 32). Not just that he was sent as a mere man. The way he taught (with authority, Matthew 7:29; Mark 1:22, 27; Luke 4:32; John 7:17), and the miracles he performed, pointed to his being more than a prophet — to the almost unspeakable truth that this is God himself.

Even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father. (John 10:38)

Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves. (John 14:10–11)

His works, performed in the world with human words and hands, showed who he was, and whose he was — just as those who rejected him showed through their works who was their father (John 8:38–41).

Industry Without Frenzy

Every indication we have of Jesus’s life and ministry is that he was (and was known as) a worker, not an idler. Not only did he labor in obscurity as a tradesman for thirty years, supporting his family as the man of the house after the death of Joseph, but the tenor of his ministry was one of energy and industry, not laziness or lethargy. His life was not without weariness (John 4:6); nor was it without physical rest and spiritual retreat (Mark 6:31). He did not think of his work as his own but as his Father’s. And for the sake of the faith of the people his Father had given him, he expended the energy God gave him, day in and day out, to carry out his calling.

We get the clear impression from the Gospels that he was busy. He was in great demand. His days were long. Yet we never get the sense that he was anxious or frenzied (even when a desperate father tries to whisk him away to save a dying daughter, Mark 5:22–36). His life was busy but not hurried.

He knew his calling and gave himself to it. Not without sleep or leisure, but he didn’t live to rest.

We Work for Good

For those of us who claim him as Lord, it is sobering to realize that on multiple occasions Jesus calls us “laborers” (Matthew 20:1, 2, 8, 14). Not only did he say the gospel “laborer deserves his wages” (Luke 10:7; Matthew 10:10), but he instructed us, as his workmen, to pray for more:

The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore pray earnestly to the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest. (Matthew 9:37–38; Luke 10:2)

Jesus calls us to work, to expend energy and effort, for the good of others. This is what makes our acts good works: that our work is good for others, not just self. “Let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 5:16).

We Learn Humble Limits

In Christ, we work, but we quickly learn, and happily acknowledge, the limits of our labors. We learn, with Peter, that Christ’s word is effective in a way that our work is not. “Master, we toiled all night and took nothing! But at your word I will let down the nets” (Luke 5:5). Our work in this world depends on his to be genuinely fruitful and of lasting value.

In fact, in particular times and ways, our not working (as in justification by faith alone) is a way to accentuate Christ’s provision and work for us (Romans 4:5). There is a time to flee, in his grace, with our own feet for freedom from Egypt, and a time to stand back “and see the salvation of the Lord, which he will work for you today. . . . The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent” (Exodus 14:13–14). Our work is fruit. His work is root. At bottom, we are like lilies of the field that “neither toil nor spin,” says Jesus, “yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these” (Matthew 6:28–29; Luke 12:27).

“Jesus had a call and gave himself to it. Not without sleep or leisure, but he didn’t live to rest.”

The foundation of Jesus’s work ethic as an example to us is the uniqueness of his work for us. The culmination of his work was his death and resurrection for sinners in a way we cannot imitate. There is a completed course (Luke 13:32), a unique finished work (John 19:30), an inimitable work we dare not seek to replace with our own. Christ does indeed call us to be laborers but not first and foremost. And when he does summon us into the fields, he invites us into a kind of rest:

Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. (Matthew 11:28–30)

Don’t misunderstand. He doesn’t call us merely into rest. But into a kind of labor, in him, that is true rest — into a kind of rest in which we receive his yoke and burden, and yet they are easy and light. While he himself works so diligently, he is gentle toward us, and lowly in heart.

So, the labor into which we enter, in his service, is humble work. We acknowledge and admit, however pioneering and enterprising our work may seem, that where it counts most, we are building on the work, and reaping the harvest, of others — first Christ himself, and also our fellows in him. “I sent you to reap that for which you did not labor,” he says to his disciples. “Others have labored, and you have entered into their labor” (John 4:38).

In humility, we do not pretend to start kingdom work from scratch, claim it as our own, and make ourselves out to be the hero. Rather, God calls us to build upon the faithful labors of others. Our work is not a tribute to our greatness. In humility, we embrace the context into which God calls us, and do our level best to build, to take the next modest steps.

How We Work

Finally, what might the life and work of Christ teach us for how we are to work?

First, we own that our working and Jesus’s giving (grace) are not at odds. We work because he is at work. “Whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God” (John 3:21), that is, in “the strength that God supplies” (1 Peter 4:11). Our works, yet carried out in the work of God.

And we can hardly say enough about what it means for us, in Christ, to have his Holy Spirit. In fact, Jesus empowers us to do “greater works,” in some sense, than he did because he goes to his Father to send us his Spirit. “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father” (John 14:12).

Then, he teaches us to look to the reward, as he himself did (Hebrews 12:1–2). As the apostle Paul reminds us, in the context of “working hard,” Jesus himself said, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35). He not only said it, but lived it, and commends it. We learn to embrace the costs of hard work, looking past the friction and barriers in the moment, to the blessing to come.

In His Work

In Christ, we work — and we do so in his own energy. No one modeled this quite like Paul. Or spoke about it as often as Paul. There is a strength in Christ in which he calls us to work. Christ himself was the source of Paul’s own strength: “I thank him who has given me strength, Christ Jesus our Lord” (1 Timothy 1:12). So, Paul writes to his protégé, “My child, be strengthened by the grace that is in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 2:1). And to the Ephesians, “Be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might” (Ephesians 6:10). And to the Philippians he testifies, “I can do all things through him who strengthens me” (Philippians 4:13).

Not just a strength in Christ but a strength of Christ. Jesus, the God-man, gives his own divine-human energy by his Spirit to empower our work. When Paul toils, as he says in Colossians 1:29, he is “struggling with all [Christ’s] energy that he powerfully works within me.”

So, in Christ, and for him, and by him, we work, and do so in a strength that Christ himself provides. For justification before God, we lay down our efforts, and in the everyday Christian life, we take up the energy of the God-man himself and we walk. Because “we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10).

David Mathis (@davidcmathis) is executive editor for desiringGod.org and pastor at Cities Church in Minneapolis/St. Paul.

Human-kind was designed to work.  Read and find that the work day is 12 hours.  Makes us seem like wimps when complaining about working past 8 hours… but our work is also in our homes, in our neighborhoods, and extended sphere of influence.  Most would like to see their work remain, that it has impact far beyond their years.  We can have eternal impact with our work, if we follow Christ and work as He worked.  May we work the work God has given each of us that we might finish and enter into the joy of our Master.

Pastor Dale

Notes of Faith October 18, 2020

Mary Magdalene is, I believe, the most misunderstood and historically distorted of Jesus’s followers recorded in the New Testament. Consider this.

Mary is only mentioned by name in the New Testament twelve times (by all four Gospel authors). Eleven out of those twelve mentions are the accounts of her witnessing the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. The one time she’s referenced elsewhere, we find the only biographical tidbits the Scripture provides: she had been delivered from seven demons (by Jesus, we assume, given the context) and, along with some other women, was accompanying Jesus’s itinerant cohort, and perhaps contributing financially to its support (Luke 8:2–3). That’s it.

And yet Mary Magdalene’s Wikipedia page offers more content than that of the apostle Peter, the apostle Paul, or the Virgin Mary. Wikipedia is by no means the measure of a biblical character’s significance, but given her sparse coverage in the Bible, it is reflective of the strange historical phenomenon that is Mary Magdalene — or rather, the legends of Mary Magdalene.

Sexually Scandalous Past?

Many in Western church traditions have somehow gathered the impression that Mary was either a former prostitute or had some kind of sexually immoral past (the Eastern traditions never bought in). Since this is not in Scripture, where did that impression come from?

Though it probably originated earlier, this idea likely gained the most traction after Pope Gregory I (Gregory the Great) gave a homily in AD 591, in which he claimed that the anonymous sinful woman in Luke 7:36–50 (he assumed the sin was sexual) and Mary of Bethany, who anointed Jesus’s feet in John 12:3–7, both referred to Mary Magdalene. Though there is no textual ground for this conclusion, it became a dominant interpretation for many centuries, creating a narrative about Mary that took hold in the popular imagination.

Then, in the Middle Ages, this imagination fueled the writing of increasingly fantastic, detailed, and completely fictional biographies of Mary. And they varied widely. Most described her as engaging in some kind of sexual immorality before her conversion. After Jesus ascended, some say she retreated to the desert to live as a holy, celibate ascetic; some have her marrying the apostle John (even asserting that the water-to-wine wedding in Cana was theirs); and some say she lived with Jesus’s mother in Ephesus.

All of this — speculative scriptural exegesis and baseless biographies — was reflected in paintings and sculptures of Mary by great artists from the Medieval, Renaissance, Baroque, and even modern eras. This only reinforced in the popular imagination the idea that Mary Magdalene was a woman with a sexually scandalous past.

Married to the Messiah?

In 2003, author Dan Brown caused a stir with his work of “historical” fiction, The Da Vinci Code. The mystery-thriller’s plot is crafted around an alleged devastating secret that the Roman Catholic Church supposedly has been guarding for many centuries: that Mary Magdalene was married to Jesus, was pregnant with Jesus’s child during the crucifixion, gave birth to a daughter named Sarah, and moved to what is now southern France, where Sarah ended up marrying into an ancient line of French kings and her bloodline (and therefore Jesus’s) continues to this day. According to this story, the “holy grail” of legend was not the chalice Jesus used at the Last Supper, but rather Mary herself. Brown asserted that he had built his fictional story on historical facts, but most scholars, both religious and nonreligious, have roundly discredited his claims.

The question is, Where in the world did such an idea about Jesus’s relationship with Mary Magdalene come from? If we follow the thread of bizarre and sordid Magdalene legends back far enough, they lead us to apocryphal, Gnostic Christian documents written long after the New Testament documents (and Mary’s lifetime), between the second and fifth centuries. And while these don’t provide us accurate information about Mary Magdalene (or Jesus or the apostles), they do give us a glimpse of the legends being circulated at that time.

“We have no historical reason to believe anything about Mary Magdalene besides what Scripture says about her.”

Of the Gnostic writings that have been found, Mary is featured in varying prominence in five: Dialogue of the Savior, Pistis Sophia, The Gospel of Thomas, The Gospel of Philip, and The Gospel of Mary (most scholars believe this to refer to Magdalene). All of these portray Mary as having an honored place among the apostles, and some cast her as Jesus’s favorite. The Gospel of Philip refers to her special status as Jesus’s “companion” (koinônos), an ambiguous term that could indicate either an erotic or platonic relationship, and mentions Jesus kissing her often, possibly on the mouth.

Mix these Gnostic accounts with the far-fetched biographies of the Middle Ages, add the fallen human propensity to deception, lasciviousness, and fascination with scandal, and it’s not surprising you get the holy Magdalene grail of Dan Brown’s novel (and its tens of millions sold), which made a deeply distorted picture of Mary Magdalene a prurient talking point in twenty-first century pop culture.

What We Do Know

The truth is that we have no historical reason to believe anything about Mary Magdalene besides the very limited, yet very significant, amount the Scripture says about her. And here is what it tells us.

We know Mary was from the town of Magdala, on the northwest coast of the Sea of Galilee. It was known for its fishing industry, though some scholars believe it also had a reputation for prostitution. We know Mary certainly did have a troubled past, for seven demons had been cast out of her (Luke 8:2). Why she had the seven demons, we don’t know. Could it have come from something like prostitution or some other sexual involvement? Or abuse? It’s possible. But at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. The Spirit has veiled Mary’s past in obscurity, and too much speculation would miss the point.

What the Spirit tells us clearly about her in all four Gospels (a rare honor) is that she was present at Jesus’s crucifixion (Matthew 27:55–56; Mark 15:40–41; John 19:25–27) and at his burial (Matthew 27:57–61; Mark 15:42–47). And then she was the first of Jesus’s followers to see the tomb empty, the first to see and speak to the risen Jesus, and the first to witness to others of his resurrection (Matthew 28:1–10; Mark 16:1–8; Luke 24:10–12; John 20:1–18).

This is one of the important truths I believe the Spirit wants us to see: a woman with a troubled past, perhaps the kind of past that we might have, was granted the gracious honor of being first.

Who Do You Say That She Is?

In first-century Palestine, a woman with a troubled past would be the last person anyone would expect to be chosen for these “firsts.” I’m sure Mary was as surprised as anyone. But Jesus had said that, in the kingdom of heaven, “the last will be first” (Matthew 20:16), and he wasted no time beginning to make good on that prophecy on the very first day of the new creation.

“Mary is a beautiful picture of the overwhelming grace of God being extended to unworthy people, like us, in Jesus.”

Mary had a shameful pedigree, but she loved and trusted Jesus. And through her faith she was given overwhelming gifts she didn’t deserve (the firsts of Easter Sunday being some of the least of them). Mary received something infinitely better than being married to the earthly Jesus; she was granted the unfathomable privilege of becoming part of his Bride, the church (Revelation 21:9). Mary received something infinitely better than bearing Jesus’s earthly daughter; she was granted the unfathomable privilege of becoming a daughter of God through Jesus (Ephesians 1:5).

There are far more wonderful things to see in the little that Scripture says of Mary Magdalene than in all the volumes of distorting speculation and ridiculous folly that have been produced over the centuries. She is mainly a beautiful picture of the overwhelming grace of God, in Jesus, being extended to unworthy people, like us.

Article by Jon Bloom
Staff writer, desiringGod.org

Too many people are fascinated by what is not in the Bible.   We need to stay focused on what is and particularly the person of Jesus Christ.  He is the way for all to know truth and have eternal life.  Draw near to God and He will draw near to you!

Pastor Dale